Delayed Census Bureau Data Already Having Impact on 2022 Elections

Share:

4/29/2021

The U.S. Census Bureau unveiled the 2020 state population counts, determining how many U.S. House seats and electoral votes each state will receive for the next 10 years. While we know what states will lose or gain a congressional seat, state officials are still missing the detailed data they need to draw official district lines. 

The delay in releasing the detailed data from the 2020 census is wreaking havoc on many state legislatures. States also rely on this data to draw the district lines that determine state Senate and House legislative districts and other local offices. 

 Census

This map, provided by our partners at National Journal, shows how census delays will impact redistricting processes across the country. 

In a normal year, the U.S. Census Bureau would release the data in March 2021, but the COVID-19 pandemic has postponed the release of that data until September 2021 or later. But some states, like New Jersey and Virginia, hold off-year state elections, and they cannot wait until two months before election day to draw state legislative district line. 

Countless states face various constitutional or statutory deadlines. According to the National Conference Of State Legislatures (NCSL)25 states face various deadlines in 2021 and the delays could prove insurmountable to overcome in a shortened timeline. 

The delay has forced states to get creative, with some asking the courts to allow the state to extend their redistricting deadlines. Even that approach is laden with its own hurdles. The Oregon State Legislature asked its Supreme Court for an extension on its redistricting deadline, but the Oregon Secretary of State disagreed with the legislatures assessment and opposes the delay.  

Others are using population estimates to begin the process of redrawing new district lines. While that approach may aid states drawing state legislative lines, it does not help state draw new Congressional lines. The U.S. Census data is essential for determining how many seats a state gets in the House, and while states can best guess if they may gain or lose a seat, that approach is fraught with risk. 

No state wants to be in a scenario where they use estimated or modeled population data to draw state legislative district lines, hold an election in 2021 or 2022, then have those results overturned in the courts. Court intervention and delay in election is not unheard of nor an impossibility. Nearly a decade ago, courts twice delayed the Texas primaries because of legal challenges to the legislative district maps. 

As states attempt to navigate the impact of the census delay on drawing new district lines, potential candidates are lining up to run for office. Obviously potential candidates would like to know the exact details of the district they are running for, but that reality may not happen until later, leaving candidates guessing. 

Potential candidates are not the only ones impacted with delays in legislative district lines. Election administrators need sufficient time to prepare ballots with the correct candidates for votes. Administrators need to complete that early enough to mail ballots to military and overseas voters at least 45 days before an election 

If you have questions about AEM’s state advocacy efforts or want to get involved, contact AEM’s Stephanie See at ssee@aem.org.

For more AEM news and updates, subscribe to the AEM Industry Advisor

Advocacy & Legislation, AEM Updates

For more AEM news and updates, subscribe to the AEM Industry Advisor.

Related Articles

AEM Applauds FTC Rule That Takes Aim at Fraud on Behalf of Exhibitors

Scammers who impersonate businesses and government entities are the target of a newly passed rule from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The Government and Business...

A Balancing Act: Preserving Farmland While Embracing Development

South Carolina has experienced the largest population growth in the nation over the last five years. Amidst this recent uptick in population and urban development, the South...

AEM Advances Pro-Manufacturing Policy Agenda in 2024

The 2.3 million men and women of the equipment manufacturing industry make the equipment that builds, powers, and feeds the world. Everywhere you look, equipment manufacturers...

AEM Advocates for the Dairy Industry at the Wisconsin Capitol

During the past 40 years, Wisconsin has lost more than 40,000 dairy farms. Small and medium dairy farmers throughout the state are struggling to stay afloat with environmental...

AEM Talks Alternative-Powered Equipment With Canadian Ag & Transport Deputy Ministers

On Feb. 21, at the Canadian Agriculture and Food Museum in Ottawa, Ontario, AEM Ag Sector Chair Bill Hurley, AGCO, Yannick Montagano, Kubota and AEM staff met with Deputy...

View all Advocacy & Legislation